<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beer Misconceptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/beer-misconceptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/beer-misconceptions/</link>
	<description>Beer Blogging from the River City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 11:24:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Monday Night Brewery &#124; Bringing great craft beer to Atlanta, Georgia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; High gravity beers gain traction</title>
		<link>http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/beer-misconceptions/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Night Brewery &#124; Bringing great craft beer to Atlanta, Georgia &#187; Blog Archive &#187; High gravity beers gain traction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-201</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m the one with the blog. The article itself is grossly misrepresented by its title, as E.S. points out here. In fact, the growth numbers aren&#8217;t pulled out from the overall growth of the craft industry, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m the one with the blog. The article itself is grossly misrepresented by its title, as E.S. points out here. In fact, the growth numbers aren&#8217;t pulled out from the overall growth of the craft industry, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.S. Delia</title>
		<link>http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/beer-misconceptions/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>E.S. Delia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;d have to agree that much of the article seemed positive, but in a scattershot way, and I think that some of the popular myths and misconceptions about beer are being perpetuated. The &quot;high-alcohol&quot; tag is an unwarranted one, I feel. Sure, a lot of craft brewers are making beer that&#039;s over 5% abv, but it feeds into the wrong idea of what &quot;extreme&quot; or &quot;avant-garde&quot; beer is and what (most of) its brewers are striving for. If consumers are buying this stuff just for the alcohol content, they&#039;d be better off sticking to spirits.

And I do get Sam&#039;s argument, but I think it only holds so much water. Comparatively, you can actually find quality wine for 15-20 bucks a bottle. It may be a few more bucks for a bottle of wine than beer, but it&#039;s not the same liquid, and I think it&#039;d be somewhat unfair to expect prices to be on the level with each other, especially considering the variety in both beer and wine. Not only that, but a lot of rare beer can be $20 and up. I just recently paid that for a bottle of Cantillon Kriek, just to finally be able to give that stuff a try. Some of the hard-to-find Italian offerings that have come into Richmond are on par with that, if not more, sometimes for even less volume than a bottle of wine.

Be that as it may, I can&#039;t automatically assume that these pricier beer options will be good, or better than many others that are cheaper. I&#039;ve tried some $10 beers that I&#039;ve been less than impressed with, and kicked myself for not picking up the $4 one. I&#039;ve taken the same chances on beer that a wine-drinking novice would on their tipple, but have also relied on guideposts that have helped light the way and learned more as I went along.

When it comes to beer or wine, I like to take jabs at that whole &quot;superiority&quot; facade that snobs hide behind. Wine could be just as accessible as beer, and often times is, in a roundabout way. People going the pompous route assume that they&#039;re the only ones drinking wine. 

Beer doesn&#039;t seem to have fully taken on these qualities yet, which is a good thing, but it could be headed in the complete opposite direction. I&#039;m sure many beer lovers can agree that flavor is what should be judged, not alcohol content.

Besides, true connoisseurs drink Scotch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;d have to agree that much of the article seemed positive, but in a scattershot way, and I think that some of the popular myths and misconceptions about beer are being perpetuated. The &#8220;high-alcohol&#8221; tag is an unwarranted one, I feel. Sure, a lot of craft brewers are making beer that&#8217;s over 5% abv, but it feeds into the wrong idea of what &#8220;extreme&#8221; or &#8220;avant-garde&#8221; beer is and what (most of) its brewers are striving for. If consumers are buying this stuff just for the alcohol content, they&#8217;d be better off sticking to spirits.</p>
<p>And I do get Sam&#8217;s argument, but I think it only holds so much water. Comparatively, you can actually find quality wine for 15-20 bucks a bottle. It may be a few more bucks for a bottle of wine than beer, but it&#8217;s not the same liquid, and I think it&#8217;d be somewhat unfair to expect prices to be on the level with each other, especially considering the variety in both beer and wine. Not only that, but a lot of rare beer can be $20 and up. I just recently paid that for a bottle of Cantillon Kriek, just to finally be able to give that stuff a try. Some of the hard-to-find Italian offerings that have come into Richmond are on par with that, if not more, sometimes for even less volume than a bottle of wine.</p>
<p>Be that as it may, I can&#8217;t automatically assume that these pricier beer options will be good, or better than many others that are cheaper. I&#8217;ve tried some $10 beers that I&#8217;ve been less than impressed with, and kicked myself for not picking up the $4 one. I&#8217;ve taken the same chances on beer that a wine-drinking novice would on their tipple, but have also relied on guideposts that have helped light the way and learned more as I went along.</p>
<p>When it comes to beer or wine, I like to take jabs at that whole &#8220;superiority&#8221; facade that snobs hide behind. Wine could be just as accessible as beer, and often times is, in a roundabout way. People going the pompous route assume that they&#8217;re the only ones drinking wine. </p>
<p>Beer doesn&#8217;t seem to have fully taken on these qualities yet, which is a good thing, but it could be headed in the complete opposite direction. I&#8217;m sure many beer lovers can agree that flavor is what should be judged, not alcohol content.</p>
<p>Besides, true connoisseurs drink Scotch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Brainard</title>
		<link>http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/beer-misconceptions/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Brainard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 01:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://relentlessthirst.wordpress.com/?p=216#comment-197</guid>
		<description>I saw that article in a different site, but I didn&#039;t have quite the same reaction as you. I am usually happy to see beer get press that is mostly positive like this article was.

However, I can see you points at some of the issues here.

First, the &quot;premium&quot; name... I wish I knew where that came from, too. I was confused by it for a while. At first I thought it was a new brand from BMC that was going to actually be premium, but then I realized it&#039;s just a meaningless designation that seems to mean &quot;not light&quot;.

The other comment I would like to contribute is my view on the beer vs. wine pricing issue. I get what Sam is saying. I don&#039;t know enough about wine to say what&#039;s the best. I think of it this way, though: for $10 you can get one of the best beers in the world, or you can take your chances on a bottle of wine. If you&#039;re dropping $10 on a beer, you are sure to have a beer that those in the know would consider a great find and a treat. As far as I can tell, for $10 in the wine aisles, you get something that might be good, but might not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw that article in a different site, but I didn&#8217;t have quite the same reaction as you. I am usually happy to see beer get press that is mostly positive like this article was.</p>
<p>However, I can see you points at some of the issues here.</p>
<p>First, the &#8220;premium&#8221; name&#8230; I wish I knew where that came from, too. I was confused by it for a while. At first I thought it was a new brand from BMC that was going to actually be premium, but then I realized it&#8217;s just a meaningless designation that seems to mean &#8220;not light&#8221;.</p>
<p>The other comment I would like to contribute is my view on the beer vs. wine pricing issue. I get what Sam is saying. I don&#8217;t know enough about wine to say what&#8217;s the best. I think of it this way, though: for $10 you can get one of the best beers in the world, or you can take your chances on a bottle of wine. If you&#8217;re dropping $10 on a beer, you are sure to have a beer that those in the know would consider a great find and a treat. As far as I can tell, for $10 in the wine aisles, you get something that might be good, but might not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
